The NZFC Review

A few days ago (as I write), the Ministry for Culture & Heritage announced that Peter Jackson would head the new Government’s Review of the Film Commission - an interesting choice, given that PJ has been quite critical of the NZFC in the past. Another interesting choice is his companion - David Court, Head of Screen Business at the Australian Film, Television & Radio School. According to the Ministry’s press release, David “will work with Peter Jackson to examine the Commission’s legislation and the constitution, function, powers and financial provisions it provides.”

I note that Graeme Mason pointed out in his meeting with industry reps last week that the review “is not legislative - that’s up to the Minister” (and might follow the review). Quoting further from the release: (Minister) Finlayson said, ‘The act was passed over 30 years ago, and during that time the face of the local film industry has changed dramatically.” (Sounds rather similar to a comment I heard from a producer in recent days - it’s tempting to wonder, who’s quoting who!)

“The film industry has been one of New Zealand’s highest profile successes of the last 15 years. This review will ensure it is receiving the support needed to continue that growth.” Sounds positive! “The NZ Film Commission is a vital and indispensable component of our film industry,” Mr. Jackson said. “I’m looking forward to making positive and constructive suggestions to ensure that it remains effective in what is a rapidly changing international movie climate. David and I intend to consult with many local filmmakers, so the review reflects the thoughts and opinions of the writers, producers, and directors the Film Commission was created to support.”

For further clues as to what PJ might recommend for the NZFC, I suggest reading Nick Grant’s interview with Peter in the latest OnFilm. I’d love to quote two complete long paragraphs here, but I’ll settle for. “

…the NZFC made a big mistake in creating a producer-led film industry. The directors and writers are the life-blood of any film industry, yet they are treated as second-class citizens by the NZFC.”

More from the press release: Key issues (include) how the Commission can most effectively help the industry meet New Zealand cultural content objectives and reach a domestic and international audience.

The review includes some “Terms of Reference” which sound potentially positive from our viewpoint:

• #6. What are the NZFC’s objectives and strategy for professional development, training, and industry support? Examine these in the light of the international and domestic environment and best practice.
• #10. How can the NZFC be responsive to the needs of New Zealand filmmakers to ensure that active industry professionals are involved in setting its strategic direction?

The full Terms of Reference are on the Ministry for Culture and Heritage’s website: www.mch.govt.nz/projects/culture/nzfc-review.html

IMPORTANT!

Comment is invited from interested parties by** 31 July 2009.** Send your written comments to: Film Review, Ministry for Culture and Heritage, PO Box 5364, Wellington, or you can email nzfcreview@mch.govt.nz.

Tony F.